The protection of personal and other sensitive data is a top priority.
The requirements of the AI Act are met at all relevant levels.
With the go-live of the NIS-2 directive, corresponding measures will be anchored.
We are prepared to assume responsibility in the form of liability.
Long before the AI Act was even debated in Brussels, our stance was clear: Only systems with traceable, verifiable behavior are truly responsible. That is why we strictly decouple models, logic, and data flows. This architectural structure ensures technical auditability, organizational control, and legal clarity—not because a law demands it, but because it is the only sensible way to build enterprise software.
The EU AI Act mandates documented training data, lineage, and system behavior. This poses no challenge when transparency is engineered into the core, rather than patched on later. Our CCMs empower you to deploy only those language generators with fully traceable origins—whether Open-Weight or Closed-Source. Decisions, reasoning paths, policies, and all data artifacts remain fully visible at all times.
Good regulation simply codifies what responsible engineering dictates: building systems that remain explainable, auditable, and controllable. Therefore, we view the EU AI Act not as a constraint, but as a welcome confirmation of our architectural philosophy.
